Opera W3-Dev menu - verision 1.21

[Toby A Inkster]

Hot on the heels of version 1.2...

About the W3-dev menu:

The W3-dev Menu is an Opera 7 customisation for web developers, providing
handy shortcuts to validate and check their pages and some useful links
to web standards and tutorials.

About version 1.21:

Bugfix and cleanup release, but with a few extra features. Choose your
favourite HTML validator during installation (choice of W3.org validator,
WDG validator and the beta of W3.org's next generation validator),
optionally switch off some of the submenus that you don't like, View CSS
for current page (won't always work!), added VisCheck (a useful tool,
although there do still seem to be some bugs in it). You can now download
the source code and use it under the GPL.

http://www.goddamn.co.uk/tobyink/?page=10

[brucie]

Post by Toby A Inkster
Hot on the heels of version 1.2...

your release cycle is too frequent. just when i get around to
customizing bits (e.g. adding extra browsers) you release another
version and i have to do it all again.

[Toby A Inkster]

Post by brucie
your release cycle is too frequent. just when i get around to
customizing bits (e.g. adding extra browsers) you release another
version and i have to do it all again.

This time it was only twelve days, admittedly. But going from 1.1 to 1.2
was a 3.5 month gap.

And nobody's forcing you to upgrade. From an end user POV the differences
between 1.2 ans 1.21 are minor.

[CrazyTerabyte]

Post by Toby A Inkster
[...]
http://www.goddamn.co.uk/tobyink/?page=10

Have you included any XML validator?

STG XML Validation
http://www.stg.brown.edu/service/xmlvalid/

[Toby A Inkster]

On Sun, 18 Apr 2004 22:05:15 +0100, Toby A Inkster

Post by Toby A Inkster
[...]
http://www.goddamn.co.uk/tobyink/?page=10

Have you included any XML validator?

No, though the W3C HTML validator does XML as long as you provide a
<!DOCTYPE> tag.

Example:
http://www.goddamn.co.uk/tobyink/rss
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.goddamn.co.uk/tobyink/rss

Though if you have a compelling reason for including some other XML
validator, I'd be happy to include one.